Tag Archives: Apple

Quick Post: Technology{The future of the tablet (Pico Projectors)}

As we have seen the release of several tablets, the Ipad 2 is one of the latest additions to the market. A nice refinement and performance upgrade that produces a much higher quality product. The Touchpad from HP is the first to break the 1 ghz barrier at 1.2 ghz. The slow pressure upward will eventually place the products at 4000 performance level or 4 ghz equivalent. As the performance reaches mid -range notebook performance demand for further innovation and inclusion will continue to be in demand.

Lazar keyboards as well as Pico projectors (micro projectors) are available but are yet to be introduced at a new level. I expect one of these companies preferably Apple, will introduce is technology capability to this market. Really what we would like to see is a combination of both, overlay on overlay with improved responsiveness with some esthetic’s touches. This will allow for tablet use as a more primary functioning utility.  It should be interesting over the next 10 -20 years as complete new operating systems need to exist at completely higher levels. Though we should really start to be seeing major hardware improvements and innovation in the next couple years.  As I have mentioned before, to this point we have seen many inclusions of new abilities pre-existing, but have not really seen real innovation that hasn’t been expected for some time.

The concern becomes  the mid addition market again. We continue to just see higher processing and light introductions, and expected multi-tasking but nothing in terms of high power out put short of gaming, really were looking for gaming graphic interface to meet education and business productivity applications to a greater extent.

Apple Iphone 4 and Company Insight

The Iphone 4 has been out for nearly a year now. With the Iphone 4 we see large improvements in the standard of the products internal developments. I write the article this morning because it is a perfect example of consumer product price barrier, the turnbuckle, if you will.

The Iphone has quickly moved up the price market to a near thousand dollar retail value. This is very interesting as we see the MSRP and quality of resources bound by the telecommunication market, specifically AT&T. The $199 price mark has been read in numerous mentions. A few items rarely pass this line. What is interesting now is the bounding of the product. Profits between Apple and AT&T seem to have a holding around this price range. This becomes apparent in the quality we see on Apple devices and actually the lack of in the Iphone 4. While most may see the Iphone 4 as a technological advancement there are simple hints seen that prove this. Simply take the backing of the item from the 3gs. This is a durable heavy duty backing with weight.

In the Iphone 4 we see a change to the poly carbonate backing with a stainless steel edging. Even the buttons are noticeably different. This issue has been a problem in American Technology for quite sometime. The stainless steel will be pushed as a luxury but I assure you the grade of metal they use is not “cheap” but is accommodating towards a budget, as well as the buttons, though they will push simplicity.

This chart is not directly applicable to Apple's market compression, though as you can see market compression can be this complicated at times.

The obvious draw back becomes do we choose technology progression or overall quality. Most can do without an Iphone 4 since the OS is available on the 3gs. The Iphone 4 was pushed too quickly forward. With advancements on some ends they became excited and move a bit too forward. They would have been better off collecting profits from the 3gs, with the release of 4.0 and a later release of the Iphone 4. It is important this mixes of quality, internally and externally, do not become mixed. It will become difficult for Apple to regather and pace itself correctly as consumers will now question their need to upgrade their product. On our end, their best hope for success will be to open their video calling on the wireless network, continue development of software,hopefully, with saved cost; profit income from enticed consumers an Iphone Version (5) of true unprecedented quality will come through balanced pace of quality technology growth.

The conclusion really is Apple has placed their future quality on a light gamble in the market. We have seen this before and their future will be heavily reliant on the next 2 years of consumer expenditure.

I have included a picture rendered from a Photoshop designer I find quite interesting as well. This picture is really depicting the need for composite batteries, small and powerful. I have seen some technologies that claim to have hold a charge over 10 times the current lithium-ion. Still, even with any Iphone at this point a 3.2 inch screen needs to move towards a 3.4 or greater, possibly a widescreen may be relevant.

The Apple Topic for Iphone 4 and Company

This is all so impressive (Iphone 4). There is something that still doesn’t pull me into Apple Products. Maybe I don’t make enough money yet to fully enjoy their products. Their computer I am never going to trust until they show some conformity to a Microsoft standard such as window orientation (opening and closing). Their software is so nice yet I cannot get over how basic it is. I truly can not determine if we are getting swindled into something bad in the long run and part of me still strongly believes we are. Apple maybe one of the most advanced topics when we discuss product architecture.

This may be one of the reasons I have never mentioned or commented about Apple.  This divulging, is something people may pay for some day. I don’t know, I just call it normal. The Architecture of platform itself is simple, the coding seems advance and the sense of the system itself works with appeal. Though the most human scientific method of accrual based on behavior through the company and trend-set methods produced by the company are often held true from the core of the organization.

The designs and product development are  constituted from the output at their most simplistic outputs. Meaning the lack of customization of a desktop often means lack of customization within the internals of overall development. What we see with Apple is an architectural base that is over simplified and at time fully attention specific against the natural instinct of long past human tradition. I mentioned the window orientation for opening and closing a window. People know when they start to read they start on the left and end on the right. Most people presume up as away as well, therefore Microsoft has done a normal approach to placing the closing in the top-right of the screen. The concern is Apple has contributed within a society within the societal rules as their own then after adoption has negated the most simplistic natures. This should worry all as a whole.  This is not all I see, though it is of concern. We see one of the only platforms that makes public sales that does not contribute to any other platforms, products, and their nature from their own profit generating product.  More explicitly, the non-licensing of Itunes indicates a possible true generative actuation that can intern hurt the nature of those consume by its core in the long-term of society. No capitalist company has every denied others use of its products or copyrights within a capitalist approach of instituting its re-occurring fundamental operations within other platforms.

The typical cycle has been to allow for use, create middle competition then accelerated to new levels as a whole. Apple has not done so. Continuous privatization even after an adopted standard without true nationalization. This is one of the scariest companies I have ever seen and they do not know it. Other indications from basic gimmick-like animations show fun and child like attributes, but have not developed through the platform and create a mixed mindset of otherwise counter productive measures within people that would be written as higher levels. Another words Apple has never created a person though has placed limit on them to their otherwise capable attributes as nothing more then a marketing scheme.  The following will integrate with the previous to show resolve, They show weight while the rest of the platform shows air and lightness. It is rather cartoon-ish and doesn’t define itself in any direction and with its companies decisions truly shows that if it stood for monetary progression it has failed by forgetting. As I speak I put a simple image together of a diversified platform. The responsibility of such a technology to symbolize such a thing would take the hands of a king. It would truly have to be programmed at the highest level to create kingdom of thought and pure balance.

I can only say if those who set forth to take  Apples reigns read these words first and know if you haven’t envisioned the cities and world that I have you are not up to the task. On a less heavy note, the platform itself shows fun within productivity though creates no true character. One would nearly have to be truly famous within all his character to own and Iphone or live an Apple lifestyle just to be underwhelmed by the over simplification of what it inevitably produces. Within a nation or world of none complete wealth, variations and shortages, Many of us are capable of achieving better lifestyles through what our phones and our things produce.  Though with Apple I simply see White and Blank, that no matter what side above or below is good for anyone. I for one do not let my products define, I as a person know their cause , their meaning and their tradition and therefore when I select a product it does define me.

“I for one do not let my products define, I as a person know their cause, their meaning and their tradition and therefore when I select a product it does define me. ”

Exert from a relevant posting (informal):

I just wrote an article on the Iphone and I’m sure I will post it again eventually, I can’t quite narrow Apple down yet, but I am almost there. Apple makes outstanding products. There is just that much distrust in me for them and our future. I mean the software is well designed, Then I look at specifics on th iMac, and the icons and tools buttons are .25 inches large on a 27 inch screen. How does that make any sense?

I get the feeling with Mac I will become this bloated fat blonde secretary that will have ditsy bimbo mistakes. That even my auto correction for spellings might be off and I might end up with a word that means piss-off in French. What I am really afraid of is I’m going to open documents and their going to be limited and formats are going to be on the left rather then the right pretty

Quite possibly how Apple Inc. actually exist at this point

soon we will all be wearing our pants backwards and not know which way is up and down. I can say we that I have to feel an expression of anger. As there is only so much consumer directed money and technology is developed on one end and not the other. This amount of distrust is almost unforgivable and I see it as some one cursing my 20’s. Our only compromise is you conform just a little bit to our standards and we double your market share.

Apple Technology Stall Expected.

We were surprised, as I’m sure there were others, of the initial release of the Apple iPad. A highly unexpected and irresponsible product release from Apple. With the processor market at the below minimum upgrade cycle expectation and value, the iPad was a non-needed addition to a market already squeezed for market availability. The additional cost of this product with other necessary evaluation direct us to believe a full technology stall will occur in Apple development. These valuations include disposable income concern against the product’s durable life and practical meaning. Durable valuation is of most concern as it is a product within a medium in an on going technology transition process, combined with the product factors such as lack of productive value , limited use, and possible disposal(breakage, defects, lost interest).

The occurrence of bank transitions will be accordingly, including institutional process thinking, What can be called the Glory Measure. A measure of all that is possible through civilization occurrence against what has occurred recently in civilization, this is a game we seemingly like to partake in and I can prove, though not today. I share this information with you to help you and myself as well. Since the irresponsibility of this action has occurred more so to benefit the Apple company short-term rather than its consumers and the economy it works within, a withholding by both the bank and institutional thinking may occur. Institutions may help Apple as ignorance rarely solves the problem. We know the holding from the banks will occur at some point unless external influence such as new business and employment occur. Again a highly selfish action on Apple’s behalf to believe this occurs on its own. Though as long as we presume this knowledge is amongst the people we can justify this by the belief help for business will become available. I will be humbled if the preceding occurs and we and the economy may congratulate Apple for their seemingly brilliant indirect channeled actions or inadvertent economic redundant mishap with an incredible solution and resolve to all. The ladder would be nearly the same occurrence of the making of durable synthetic rubber, not how we wanted this to occur but with resolve.

Quickly explained, the transitional holding from the bank will occur based on the life span of the product. The products sovereign value is low and poor judgement is proven on the purchasers behalf during a recessive economy. The banks are unlikely to release and re-release funds as it is directed in the incorrect direction. Another words the fact that one can afford goods is meaningless, it is the fact that the funds that have chosen to be disposable are often shared as optional investment equity. One can also see the retraction by the bank as their ability to release fund directionally. Though with constant proof from a spectrum of the lowest and highest companies that they will vantage their leverage rather then lead their future this becomes difficult for banks to direct finance as this influence is infiltrating to some and to other their sole belief in the way business is completed, regardless both share the same in common of an incorrect method.