There are several analytic basis that can be concurring to this story. Events that have taken place in history that coincide with this article and it is my hope journalist and researchers for sometime will provide such information. The American controversy has always been a great one. It starts with Athens, Greece and most of Eastern Europe and end in the States. Every so often an Emperor of Rome must make a decision. Reoccurringly the Tenisian wife comes into play. A hybrid of the Pennsylvania Dutch, Athens and the rest of Europe, some believe she is the key to the Roman Emperors power. When she is in Athens she creates the work force of wealth, when she is in Tennessee the powers and controls of time and when in Rome a superior Sun/Son all to hold forth. What is an America? Is it the channels in which we create our future lives? Is it remote slavery or punishment? It is possible that all apply here. A time to construct the once seemingly impossible. A way to negotiate opportunity. With loose tie and civil line political play ultimately becomes of course. Does a bad republic create the democratic ties to overthrow or undermine to not accept victory but produce defeat? An Emperor’s true battle when marrying a new republic are these fine lines of negotiation. For instance we take Kim Perry (search Athena’s adolescence) with America as the congressional tie one can presume the issues within her congressional control. Again to undermine or overthrow but potentially the conviction of commitment. The major issues with Athenian policy is the proof of existence. Athena may produce a congregation toward the consolidation of her existence but is the existence of congregation worth producing. Most commonly one can assert the highest function is in play and only the common investment, typically beautification and attribution but possibly time are all that play. Unfortunately the premise is almost always proven to be of lower existence then the full potential of the outcome without negotiation. (see American policy) It will continuously produce democratic value and poor attribution with only means of controlled contribution to be extorted for attributing circumstances. This form is known as Quantitative poverty. Severe cases exist in America. What can one construct from such existences presented? Ultimately and unfortunately we can presume that if quantitative poverty exist in one’s presence the further seeming attributions of existence are likely non-beneficial. As the future Emperor of this planet my decisions become confined to only notions towards time, subjectively. It is possible to reside toward such belief that this was simply a system of demonstration. I believe it is necessary to conclude the channels of negotiation have been created. Though from what I’ve seen ticket stubs for dimes are no better a conclusion then a raffle on a cereal box. One must realize there are very few times an Emperor can accommodate new society, and true white beauty is hard to find. I can only assert very few notions about America. The platform too large, the construct too small and the people in too much need. It is small and at best accommodates a Tenisian wife and an Emperor. Still though channels may be created one must ask themselves if it has a physical purpose greater then it’s pre-configured platform. From a citizen’s point of view mass skyscrapers are continuously modernized and produced with nearly a 90% unemployment rate. The buildings are empty and most beliefs in Banks are no greater then a grocery store. A mass white class of impoverished judgement is perceived between the barriers of non-existence and Georgia. Most would agree it is simply to demean and prevent the culturalization of civilization. Strangely, the population can find little to no higher existence rather then promote it has active stake in a world that is certain on their behalf have the slightest clue toward that which they participate in.
Tag Archives: economics
The very cliche’ and basic issue of exported manufacturing of sovereign goods to foreign nation is here as the topic again. This time I want to state some real concern. As we have heard since the time we are young about the issues of shipping labor and technology over seas and issues involved as the causes of bad economic status, we still live with the issues today. The issues are much deeper then most would see at first sight. This may seem a bit childish and cliche’ at first but stick with me.
To start, the very basic exporting of goods to foreign nation creates a non sovereign network. Jumping right to it, No matter how much is produced by another nation, even in relation to a weighed measure of productivity to the cost of production, the overall conclusion is a decrease is sovereignty. There is less degradation from sovereign states. The purchasing of foreign materials from small developing countries alone hurt overall industry, obviously. Here’s is how deep it goes. Foreign goods are purchased in America, take Nike as an example. A seen American/European Brand produced in small developing countries. These are sold in stores for say $50 at NikeTown Stores, and other sporting goods stores, these go purchased by people who need and can afford one with a profit margin of $40 per ball. Now if these were produced in America they would cost $80 per ball with wages of $12-$15 per hour. Though if this trend held true across all manufacturing industries we would likely see an increase in overall purchases of Nike Apparel. The demand of higher quality goods would be wanted and accessible. There would be more direct channels between the stores and manufacturing for more stores, come with better brand recognition as well as continuous better developed stores, contemporary updated designs, as we well know this creates perspective for areas and increases the overall need for renovation.
Instead, what is happening is this. The purchase of American good through foreign organization dilutes our currencies regardless of how much is produced. It creates an untied loop to these small nations while continually decreasing need for updated facilities throughout America. I am certain this hurts the standard of American goods as well and even Agriculture. Another words even if the price of goods temporarily increased in America they would inevitably decrease as we continue to purchase from ourselves. If we only produced within our nation from our nation with balanced trade only amongst the major sovereign countries Goods that were once $80 will become $50. This brings me to our government needing to find real barriers. Too often times companies maintain their price levels with minor upgrades simply because the product is as high quality as it can be. While raising price barriers and costing less to produce, further venture typically ends up in possible dilution away from the core of the company. In the mean time, between innovation and maximum product achievement price levels often rise with little return to society. This is a major concern. This money is the kind of money that creates savings that carry over to other industries for consumer spending as well as help keep money deflated and sovereignty high. This money should be strategically placed within the mid markets for new companies to create a more sovereign network.
As these measures are not met struggle for free business and strong government regulations begin to converge as we continuously see little no benefit within a plan that would work with minor changes. There is no doubt about it, Strong ties to national responsibility is a must for any large corporation. It can not exist much longer any other way. Taking profit in the short creates small lead in to the future. Though I actually have a bit of compassion for some companies as some who have achieved great business have gotten there on supply and demand and once they reach such a large level it must be hard for some to comprehend their businesses decreasing profit in the short to continue a strong future. Again, this is why we continuously see large variables in stock market/ shareholder prices.
There is only so much money to go around and if your not keeping it in America their not going to continually provide currency. Some believe it is American currency in foreign nations that makes our currency’s strong internationally, this is an excuse and untrue. Whether it is our currency or Britain’s or France’s currency they inevitably exchange at a level they would otherwise amongst each other. There is little to no added benefits of supporting these nations other than for the true native resources they pocess. If you truly want to help them allow them to create their own national products and begin as America had started and progressed in the early 1900’s.
It has become apparent that the Afghanistan grounds are and treasure of mineral resources including lithium and semi precious metals. Infrastructure would be an obvious measure to mining and civility creation. Until our own infrastructure succeeds saying we will create infrastructure is more of an empty commitment then it is a reality.
We must get back to a time of barter and culture approval. Just as in ancient and Babylonian times culture was given to their conquered country to show an alignment of trust through the new susceptible people. This creation allows of the prior loyalist to see offerings of American nature. Statues and goods must be given to the people. Cars and roads will create a good showing. It may be in our best interest to allow the Chinese to initialize the hard digging as their economy allows what would be called bargain labor from international eyes.
Although most of this seems obvious it would be of a good nature to mine their grounds. It will be the first step towards government. No country has established a good government before the financial rise of a country, although I do believe at a medium government becomes the only means to bring the created human bounds of finance higher.
This idea has been the simplest to say, to barter and create culture, but the hardest for America. What is American culture. From a most objective point of view it struggle, hardship and war, with prosperity from an ill nature. We have strong , loyal , treasures that know better than to be song heroes for they are sure to fall victims of a society that profits off of good intentions. The only manor in which to speak of them would be in folk tale and native American tone, sure not to play them up much or they could be associated with Hugh Heffners or Donald Trumps. I’m not calling them evil but more so, not of a rooted nature to carry on any means of starting a new society.
We must become great for the first time and lead through Rome’s way
I am able to demonstrate infrastructure down to its finest detail.