Tag Archives: infrastructure

The Tenisian and The Emperor

Screenshot_2012-12-09-06-11-58There are several analytic basis that can be concurring to this story. Events that have taken place in history that coincide with this article and it is my hope journalist and researchers for sometime will provide such information. The American controversy has always been a great one. It starts with Athens, Greece and most of Eastern Europe and end in the States. Every so often an Emperor of Rome must make a decision. Reoccurringly the Tenisian wife comes into play. A hybrid of the Pennsylvania Dutch, Athens and the rest of Europe, some believe she is the key to the Roman  Emperors power. When she is in Athens she creates the work force of wealth, when she is in Tennessee the powers and controls of time and when in Rome a superior Sun/Son all to hold forth. What is an America? Is it the channels in which we create our future lives? Is it remote slavery or punishment? It is possible that all apply here. A time to construct the once seemingly impossible. A way to negotiate opportunity. With loose tie and civil line political play ultimately becomes of course. Does a bad republic create the democratic ties to overthrow or undermine to not accept victory but produce defeat? An Emperor’s true battle when marrying a new republic are these fine lines of negotiation. For instance we take Kim Perry (search Athena’s adolescence) with America as the congressional tie one can presume the issues within her congressional control. Again to undermine or overthrow but potentially the conviction of commitment. The major issues with Athenian policy is the proof of existence. Athena may produce a congregation toward the consolidation of her existence but is the existence of congregation worth producing. Most commonly one can assert the highest function is in play and only the common investment, typically beautification and attribution but possibly time are all that play. Unfortunately the premise is almost always proven to be of lower existence then the full potential of the outcome without negotiation. (see American policy) It will continuously produce democratic value and poor attribution with only means of controlled contribution to be extorted for attributing circumstances. This form is known as Quantitative poverty. Severe cases exist in America. What can one construct from such existences presented? Ultimately and unfortunately we can presume that if quantitative poverty exist in one’s presence the further seeming attributions of existence are likely non-beneficial. As the future Emperor of this planet my decisions become confined to only notions towards time, subjectively. It is possible to reside toward such belief that this was simply a system of demonstration. I believe it is necessary to conclude the channels of negotiation have been created. Though from what I’ve seen ticket stubs for dimes are no better a conclusion then a raffle on a cereal box. One must realize there are very few times an Emperor can accommodate new society, and true white beauty is hard to find. I can only assert very few notions about America. The platform too large, the construct too small and the people in too much need. It is small and at best accommodates a Tenisian wife and an Emperor. Still though channels may be created one must ask themselves if it has a physical purpose greater then it’s pre-configured platform. From a citizen’s point of view mass skyscrapers are continuously modernized and produced with nearly a 90% unemployment rate. The buildings are empty and most beliefs in Banks are no greater then a grocery store. A mass white class of impoverished judgement is perceived between the barriers of non-existence and Georgia. Most would agree it is simply to demean and prevent the culturalization of civilization. Strangely, the population can find little to no higher existence rather then promote it has active stake in a world that is certain on their behalf have the slightest clue toward that which they participate in. profile pic


The Need for the Gold Standard and How it works.

As we look at the on going issues with the American economy we can find significant issues with the economy and the people amongst it within businesses.

As I have stated several times through out my writings about the issues with service for service businesses as well as the need for better regulation through out the transitions of cash flow. Mentioned several times recently, the Gold Standard has become a heavy topic for American currency. While the idea of the American Dollar’s weight does work it has been proven it only works in an established economy that knows better.  Being a young nation several kinds of people and organizations manipulate society and any regulations to favor themselves for arbitrary reasons. We often hear of this and we often see this.

With this means potential blatant disregard for national responsibility. This is why we need the Gold Standard. The implementation of the gold standard, specifically places Gold and possibly silver as well as platinum along side of every dollar, meaning direct collateral worth per measure. More directly the dollar will need to be placed against these metals is allocated amounts. (Ex. 1 dollar is .01 ounces of gold) under no circumstance shall this change.

What will occur? This allows for easy regulation and an overall measure of performance outcomes. More directly, businesses and people who do not act with their wealth, typically businesses and people with 100 million plus in liquid availability whom do not act responsibly to provide nation worth, will feel the effects of this. Another words, companies purchasing from one another at inflated prices can be directly down regulated simply by moving the price of gold down.

Obviously this is part of the measures our government currently takes try and regulate the economy as we know it goes much deeper than this. The Gold Standard will make regulation much easier and potentially allow for penalty on foreign advocates much easier as well. Though this would need be an international stance and we will need near total unification.

When will it be used? The use of the Gold Standard may very well be implemented in index terms with much stricter policy and accountably. Currently we have no direct way of regulating the dollars worth. Price of goods is not an option in a free market, as there are many quality alternatives and it does not direct the negative assessment towards the problem.

With this implementation, Groups, Families, and organizations will have to continuously take part in a national plan. Their visions of construction will be implemented though again, with strong guidelines for modernization and infrastructure. This will mean wealth will no longer stand still in anyone place and responsibility of failure will be taken to move towards success. Today, it is no longer acceptable to be-seat another in to foul, as I have always believed it was unacceptable. Each persons failure stamps America and American society with degraded circumstances of opportunity and success.
More directly the communities you work near or far, people you know or not are still part of  your responsibility.  Restrictions may be implemented, laws may be made in local areas as guidelines, though when you profit it is your duty to organize and implement these plans failure to do so will be attributed by interstate trade sanction and down regulation of currency. As I go further the need for possible state currency with interstate acceptability may be needed as I believe this will place true responsibility on the people within them.

With lack of progress 5 million dollars worth of purchasing power can become 2 million in a matter of a week. My suggestion would be to push for gold to placed amongst the 200-500 dollar range. Allowing for quick implementation and stability. This information must be outwardly and inplicitly implemented as non-explicit(unspoken and otherwise) implementation will allow for further manipulation amongst wealthy areas amongst the people of less financial wealth and state borders. The worth of finance and investment in successful entrepreneurship and new opportunities will be the result of this regulation. I believe that no descent Idea in a nation of Capitalism should go wasted, no matter how big or small. Those ideas not tied and bound are the natures that set our economy apart from others. That is Freedom; That is the American way.

Lincoln didn’t only set the Blacks free he set whites free as well. America will protects its union once again if necessary from any and all evils’ that exist, passive aggressive or blatant, where ever they exist.

Nicholas A. Cristella for President 2020
I Can Take U.S. There

Letter on Negative Competition from Child Birth.

I have looked over our American resources and circumstances that create family and quality of life. The practice of breeding, having children too early and in some cases can be considered a cruel joke and devious plan by weak men and woman in positions to create such. I plead with you to not have children until your family reaches a combined salary of 150k and minimal children at that. Enjoy your lives together but do not have children unless you can provide a true higher standard for them.

It will be our job as a people to provide adequate living standards without the reliance and support of having children.

The only reason negative competition exists today is immense, uncertain, and unstable child birth. These unwanted child births continually place stress on lives and create distortion of the circumstances that accrue through life. It will be one of my strongest agendas in the future to provide true salary growth bonuses, benefits and perk who abstain from premature child birth.

This should be a picture of an unplanned child and another persons' pockets and opportunities shrinking.

The concern then becomes how can we create a fair life for those whom seek to have children. As making a salary marker creates birth as a privilege and also a yo-yo device that can allocate who can have children. This is why we need stronger regulation from government of outside business. Not businesses they (owners) own or invest-in but all businesses in America.
We will make it a free society and when we catch up to the population we rest upon, almost all people will be able to have children.

Part of me wants to say 1 child per person per amongst the two makers and unless we can create better science to produce these out comes of gender this is not an acceptable order at this time.    

The Apple Topic for Iphone 4 and Company

This is all so impressive (Iphone 4). There is something that still doesn’t pull me into Apple Products. Maybe I don’t make enough money yet to fully enjoy their products. Their computer I am never going to trust until they show some conformity to a Microsoft standard such as window orientation (opening and closing). Their software is so nice yet I cannot get over how basic it is. I truly can not determine if we are getting swindled into something bad in the long run and part of me still strongly believes we are. Apple maybe one of the most advanced topics when we discuss product architecture.

This may be one of the reasons I have never mentioned or commented about Apple.  This divulging, is something people may pay for some day. I don’t know, I just call it normal. The Architecture of platform itself is simple, the coding seems advance and the sense of the system itself works with appeal. Though the most human scientific method of accrual based on behavior through the company and trend-set methods produced by the company are often held true from the core of the organization.

The designs and product development are  constituted from the output at their most simplistic outputs. Meaning the lack of customization of a desktop often means lack of customization within the internals of overall development. What we see with Apple is an architectural base that is over simplified and at time fully attention specific against the natural instinct of long past human tradition. I mentioned the window orientation for opening and closing a window. People know when they start to read they start on the left and end on the right. Most people presume up as away as well, therefore Microsoft has done a normal approach to placing the closing in the top-right of the screen. The concern is Apple has contributed within a society within the societal rules as their own then after adoption has negated the most simplistic natures. This should worry all as a whole.  This is not all I see, though it is of concern. We see one of the only platforms that makes public sales that does not contribute to any other platforms, products, and their nature from their own profit generating product.  More explicitly, the non-licensing of Itunes indicates a possible true generative actuation that can intern hurt the nature of those consume by its core in the long-term of society. No capitalist company has every denied others use of its products or copyrights within a capitalist approach of instituting its re-occurring fundamental operations within other platforms.

The typical cycle has been to allow for use, create middle competition then accelerated to new levels as a whole. Apple has not done so. Continuous privatization even after an adopted standard without true nationalization. This is one of the scariest companies I have ever seen and they do not know it. Other indications from basic gimmick-like animations show fun and child like attributes, but have not developed through the platform and create a mixed mindset of otherwise counter productive measures within people that would be written as higher levels. Another words Apple has never created a person though has placed limit on them to their otherwise capable attributes as nothing more then a marketing scheme.  The following will integrate with the previous to show resolve, They show weight while the rest of the platform shows air and lightness. It is rather cartoon-ish and doesn’t define itself in any direction and with its companies decisions truly shows that if it stood for monetary progression it has failed by forgetting. As I speak I put a simple image together of a diversified platform. The responsibility of such a technology to symbolize such a thing would take the hands of a king. It would truly have to be programmed at the highest level to create kingdom of thought and pure balance.

I can only say if those who set forth to take  Apples reigns read these words first and know if you haven’t envisioned the cities and world that I have you are not up to the task. On a less heavy note, the platform itself shows fun within productivity though creates no true character. One would nearly have to be truly famous within all his character to own and Iphone or live an Apple lifestyle just to be underwhelmed by the over simplification of what it inevitably produces. Within a nation or world of none complete wealth, variations and shortages, Many of us are capable of achieving better lifestyles through what our phones and our things produce.  Though with Apple I simply see White and Blank, that no matter what side above or below is good for anyone. I for one do not let my products define, I as a person know their cause , their meaning and their tradition and therefore when I select a product it does define me.

“I for one do not let my products define, I as a person know their cause, their meaning and their tradition and therefore when I select a product it does define me. ”

Exert from a relevant posting (informal):

I just wrote an article on the Iphone and I’m sure I will post it again eventually, I can’t quite narrow Apple down yet, but I am almost there. Apple makes outstanding products. There is just that much distrust in me for them and our future. I mean the software is well designed, Then I look at specifics on th iMac, and the icons and tools buttons are .25 inches large on a 27 inch screen. How does that make any sense?

I get the feeling with Mac I will become this bloated fat blonde secretary that will have ditsy bimbo mistakes. That even my auto correction for spellings might be off and I might end up with a word that means piss-off in French. What I am really afraid of is I’m going to open documents and their going to be limited and formats are going to be on the left rather then the right pretty

Quite possibly how Apple Inc. actually exist at this point

soon we will all be wearing our pants backwards and not know which way is up and down. I can say we that I have to feel an expression of anger. As there is only so much consumer directed money and technology is developed on one end and not the other. This amount of distrust is almost unforgivable and I see it as some one cursing my 20’s. Our only compromise is you conform just a little bit to our standards and we double your market share.

Where America’s Economy is Headed. The Do and Do Not.

Based on current technology and conditions of the market I will supply the direction the market is headed as well as the basic needs for the market to stabilize towards a sovereign outcome.

The industries that have been important will stay important.  Within my company I provide perspective on each industry and initiative in to each.

The American market has been gutted from the inside and new acquisition of companies in the current state of the American economy through the month of August could be seen as meaningless.

The current direction of the economy is highly fragile and intentionally fragmented throughout. Mentions of future glide path and real estate numbers are all nonsense and again of no importance. The under education of people moving into industries is the issue, most commonly hype-advertising to lead people into a market gaining short- term profits while acting irresponsible and detrimental to the economy, on their own behalf.

Real Estate and manufacturing, as well as several other industries are ultimately priced as the conclusion to the economy. A person may choose to purchase more of something but this is no more than an alternative out of disposable income and mind as well be seen as a soft loss. Though looking at alternative when product quality and product follow through are not sustainable(gaming consoles come to mind), products alternatives rise such as clothing and more personally contributive goods including phones and music players that give option to the consumer of the value and durability of the good through practical use and care.

I have state my grief recently about this method of appreciating the value of good this way as part of me believes people are taking human worth away from to contribute to materialistic worth with agenda.
All must believe high quality products deserve care, though we should not drain our souls for them. The ideals on this matter have been back tested and proven in my favor during advanced social research.

It is the creation of life through these products that give them value. It is the sovereign lifestyles of a collaboration of these goods that allow them bring value to a part of life. No person should feel a less than inspired by the ownership of such goods.

Continuing, how does this pertain to the economy and the value of goods? This proves that high quality goods actually devalue through human perspective during hard times through fragmentation of life. The purpose of an economy is to allow for the manufacturing of new lives. Whether this economy is from a foreign accommodating nation or solely domestic, I do not know what went wrong though I can only believe someone did not understand until now.

My company Decisive Decisions Marketing, LLC is a multi-market conglomerate looking to do just that.  Protect our nation through push forward of good understanding.  I believe the most growth in our economy will come from collaborative branding and modeling.  An example comes to mind a lightly branded HP, (Sony’s Playstation) an Acura made/branded (Sony’s Playstation) and more, with easy accessible and distribution methods.  Advancements of simplicity ideas place amongst advance technology in beautiful practical exterior casing. The new growth is in mid-markets, not to be confused with middle-men discount merchants. Direct purchasing still stands. Can you believe the men from 1900 didn’t have it wrong?  Our Auto-manufacturing plan is another growth market. With 100’s of options and new ideas that have been stagnant for some time. While I encourage my own company, I encourage yours as well.  A Bugatti cost 1.1 million dollars. If we place them in a mid-market and start manufacturing I’m sure we can sell them for fewer than 100,000 with minimal sacrifice in quality and revolutionize the car industry. Jaguar is another, nothing more than a blank slate needing correct manufacturing and management, with new ideas and defining looks. Ashton Martin has played this role until this point. I believe we can place them in a Mid-Market and manufacturer them at levels new consumers can afford. I believe Jaguar is one of the few companies that are prepared for the insertion of metal crafting and design and can be regionalized effectively.

Our plan and again to others, New growth comes to the economy through sole leadership while controlling the regulation of the economy through management.  Managing regionalizing facilities, franchising towns, creation of new assets, and the list goes on. This is simple regulation.

Occurrences including Bernie Madoff, as well Enron and several others cannot be seen as smart scandals, simple incompetence. We all know pushing demand on electricity drives up the price, though when your pulling your own money in a government and society that can simply remove your life as well as retract circulation, stalling technology, and growth it simply lets us know owners have run out of ideas. For too long companies act on their own so much in what we call get-along-gangs, people whom identify with one another and typically lack business skill, are killing all of us.

Negative occurrence even occurs at the highest levels of wealth, whether it is hardship, or struggling ethics that take toll on life. It ultimately can only be seen as poor judgment including Goldman Sachs.  The only knowledgeable companies have given us at this point is proven old laws correct. That being 5th amongst a larger market share is often better than being 1st amongst a shrinking one.  This also pertains to finances, not accommodating your own economy by mentioning pricing demand actually take toll.  Capitalism support new invention, new growth, new ideas, and the worth of any of these is accommodated by the economy.  It cannot support pulling more finances out of the economy simply because people need it.

What everyone needs to understand is that there is always a lead into every market; an amount that can be drained by squeezing too hard on your position. That 100,000,000 you don’t charge is the 10 billion in future creation. This is highly applicable to utilities and commodities.

In business this sounds advanced yet basic.  It has been awhile since any one in business has done anything business like.  Though we can assume our next press forward will be our greatest.

Often, companies are looking for commodities to implicate a market move. I have researched and proven that this is nearly impossible to measure off of any group of commodities looking as an specific trending groups to implicate an entire market is no more useful than look at the color of a good luck charm to tell you to bid or not. Consumer support comes from supporting your consumer. Are your products placing them a step closer to achieving wealth and meaning to life. It can be in any sort of market but these rules apply. I will name what people could possibly want from specific markets, meet these criteria’s and have no issue with your company.

  • Reoccurring disposable products (Ex. Kraft goods, Johnson & Johnson) – practical use  and infrastructure( lowering the cost of utility goods) (inclusion into higher pay (higher now due to a non-sustainable economy ridiculed by inadequate goods))
  • Automobile – Manufacturing at high quality standards with the understanding of infrastructure ( knowing that wasting entire resources because of faulty parts  currently 8-13 out of 100 (that’s considered good to Americans) What kind of person is comprised of something that allows that number to stand for over 20 years possible since the inception of the car.
  • Utility goods – Infrastructure knowledge that this allows business start-up and life to occur
  • Product Creation – The appreciation of the product. Again too often technologies are not be compounded upon. The product is not being celebrated and the exteriors as well as internal components go sacrificed to accommodate a starving economy. It is much proven that that lower quality and price rarely satisfy a market and prove detrimental to the economy as whole as well as fragmenting lifestyle and relationship.
  • Services as Products – Performance first, No one is to trust anyone who places purchase before performance.  When looking to accrue funding this is a no! Currently State charges applications fees, I am highly against this. Based on the number of applications and the approval rate assuming 1 in any 100 get approved a fee deduction seems reasonable from the funding. There are few reasonable cases where commitment fees are expectable and they typically have to do with the law.

I must apologize that I feel highly disturbed that I have to explain some of the statements I have made. To not understand these reasonable actions, specifically the service as product is painful. Again this seems to protect an economy, an economy that is incomplete and non-satisfactory during most times.

Ultimately, it comes back to the cliché’ saying, there is never a bad time for new growth. All implications of the market, as small as this market is, are made to allow allocation control by larger forces, specific business and government.

Concerns of Cosolidations as means of Control.

It has become obvious that consolidation has become the key control for American industries. Extreme measures have been taken in technology, the automotive industry , as well as the the entire stock and commodity market to move funding and resources into a consolidated market. These measures are of great concern (elaborated later).

The simplest example is the seen in the NYSE, America’s most prominent open market. As price falls we see a significant rise in the price of gold. This is a move of the aristocratic nature. Explicitly, those whom have lost ties with current business ethics, values, standards and have refused to ethically relinquish control of their once honorable funds. Warren Buffet is one whom comes to mind.

This measure is of a simple model of a fearful new realm investing and current systematic funding to emerging businesses. Creation of Derivatives is another measure to concentrate resources against ounces another to create a wall in to this money. Gold is being used as such a tool. When these measures occur at an overwhelming level. They create a congruent model throughout, as we see in the automotive industry, Ford being the example, and technology, Google being the example.
While we have always believe in consolidated concentrated goods and services , the vulnerability and weakness of a large market share without solid fundamental support is apparent. We will see a monopoly affect of adequate goods sliced into small weak corporations without means to a common goal.

These kind of companies create jug handle technology and produce a stale-mate.in technology. Is is the people goal to stay current and up to date, to not accept new as something they didn’t have before but technology that represents the greatness of who they are, to take bare essentials and see the products that are merely adequate as an insult. To take lack of progression and use of this progression as a direct insult to themselves, their country, and the generation of the world they live in.