Anyone else believe Harvard’s Plan for Globalization is too Global?
As we see on the micro level uniform stretches create less competition, less propiety, and become extremely basic. England had it correct with the monarchy. America has it correct with Democracy. As we see over and over again, the best answers are the composition of all.
The need for privatizing countries was a law of idea passed long ago and while Harvard offers much to the world they also endorse consistant shifts in business resource allocation, also known as international business and investment trends. Looking at the broad perspective in society, America is rather uniform and nearly communist. The diversions of responsibility from consistant transitions in democracy divert responsibility while create opporunities for incapable and excuses to be there.
While democracy is neccessary it is uninspiring at times and can be seen as instable with little oversight. We have consistantly allowed those who know no true role to continuously creating diversion tactics to allow Moms and Dads in the highest position in American Society.